[oslc-core] Add oslc:modifiedBy to Core Vocabulary

[Arthur Ryman]

Steve,

I think we need to delegate the definition of who qualifies as a 
contributor to the domain specs. For cm, it is probably the person or 
person who performed the work, not anyone who commented on it. 

Regards, 
___________________________________________________________________________ 

Arthur Ryman 

DE, PPM & Reporting Chief Architect
IBM Software, Rational 
Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) 





From:
Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com>
To:
oslc-core at open-services.net
Date:
03/21/2012 05:40 PM
Subject:
Re: [oslc-core] Add oslc:modifiedBy to Core Vocabulary
Sent by:
oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net



Arthur, 

Responses below...

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645

> From: Arthur Ryman <ryman at ca.ibm.com>
> To: oslc-core at open-services.net, 
> Date: 03/14/2012 04:40 PM
> Subject: [oslc-core] Add oslc:modifiedBy to Core Vocabulary
> Sent by: oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> dcterms: defines dcterms:created and dcterms:creator. It also defined 
> dcterms:modified, but NOT dcterms:modifiedBy. This has led to some 
> implementations using dcterms:contributor and some defined their own 
> modifiedBy term.
> 
> The OSLC Core spec specifies that dcterms:modified as follows:
> 
> Timestamp last latest resource modification 
> 
> We should therefore define oslc:modifiedBy in the OSLC Core vocabulary, 
to 
> pair up with dcterms:modified.
No objections from me.  We also talked at today's telecon and no 
objections with this, but had some discussion on the following...

> dcterms:contributor should be used as a multi-valued propoerty to 
indicate 
> the people who contributed to the resource, not just the person who last 


> modified it.

What does this really mean "who contributed"?  If the work item is a 
resource in which 23 different people collaborated on this work item, 
would you expect this to include 23 entries for dcterms:contributed?  This 

seems a bit expensive to compute and not a typical scenario I would think. 

 Is there any way we can provide a bit more clarity on this through some 
scenarios it supports?  It would also be good to know how it impacts other 

specs.  Taking a quick look at CM [1], it describes the usage of 
dcterms:contributor as:
  "The person(s) who are responsible for the work needed to complete the 
change request (reference: Dublin Core). It is likely that the target 
resource will be a foaf:Person but that is not necessarily the case."

We agreed today to hold off and discuss at next telecon (April 4th) and 
via email.

[1] - 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecificationV2#CM_Resource_Definitions



_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net