[oslc-core] Proposal for Issue-25: Encoding of UI preview label
Steve K Speicher
sspeiche at us.ibm.com
Fri Jul 27 08:25:13 EDT 2012
> Something I need to be clear on: is it the case that this issue applies
only
> to UI preview because UI preview is the only case in OSLC where a
resource
> is defined to be XML and not RDF?
> Since XMLLiteral is defined by RDF, an XML-based resource definition
does
> not "have access to" its definition (it's outside of XML, and going
outside
> of XML for its definition is not desireable)?
This issue is really about that the content of these XML elements really
should just be strings and not embedded XML content, regarding of how the
value type is defined (i.e. XMLLiteral definition in RDF/XML or complex
content in XML). It just happens we were down a path "make our XML
consumable by RDF/XML parsers as well" which added to some confusion. The
issue originated due to the complexities of the primary consumer of this
content is HTML/JS, so having to parse the content and convert to HTML
tags was onerous compared with just grabbing the content of the
title/description and just jamming into a node.
Hope that adds some clarity.
Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
More information about the Oslc-Core
mailing list