[oslc-core] [oslc] Reconsidering the "S" in OSLC

[Olivier Berger]

Hi.

On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 16:26:08 -0500, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> I'm proposing to fix the problem with "S" standing for "Services" and 
> instead introduce "Specifications". So try this on for size,
> 
>     Open Specifications for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC)
> 
> Open Specifications is really what we want the focus to be out.  

+1

I guess it's better also to avoid confusion with Open Services == Open
Source implementations : these are Open Specs, but not necessarily
implemented in an Open Source way for the compliant products.

Just my 2 cents,

-- 
Olivier BERGER 
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)