[oslc-core] OSLC specification version numbering guidance
Olivier Berger
olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu
Wed Jan 11 04:42:25 EST 2012
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:14:20 -0500, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> #1 Coordinate numbers across all domains
>
> Set guidance that a WG spec will match its version number with "nearest"
> Core version number that it is based off of.
> If there is a need for minor spec update before next major version number,
> using n.0 and then n.1. Take a concrete example, say a spec (Automation)
> starts now and is based on Core 2.0, it will be Automation 2.0.
>
>
> I'm in favor #1, stating it as guidance and not a hard rule.
>
+1
Best regards,
P.S.: sorry for previous empty response (not yet enough coffeine in the
blood ;-)
--
Olivier BERGER
http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
More information about the Oslc-Core
mailing list