[oslc-core] Need for a new specification phase/status: "deprecated"

[Arthur Ryman]

Steve,

How about just an "Inactive" state, indicating the the workgroup is no 
longer actively developing the spec?

Regards, 
___________________________________________________________________________ 

Arthur Ryman 

DE, Chief Architect, Reporting &
Portfolio Strategy and Management
IBM Software, Rational 

Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) 





From:
Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com>
To:
oslc-core at open-services.net
Date:
04/20/2012 09:23 AM
Subject:
Re: [oslc-core] Need for a new  specification   phase/status: "deprecated"
Sent by:
oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net



But "Suspended" implies it could possibly start again.  As you say, 
deprecated implies something replaces it but we can make it clear what 
each usage means by providing some supporting description.  I just 
hesitate to create a number of these "parked" spec statuses when one  with 

some explanation may suffice.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645

> From: Arthur Ryman <ryman at ca.ibm.com>
> To: John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM at IBMUS, 
> Cc: oslc-core at open-services.net, oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> Date: 04/19/2012 04:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Need for a new specification phase/status: 
"deprecated"
> Sent by: oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> There should be a "Suspended" state. Deprecated implies that something 
> newer replaced it.
> 
> Regards, 
> 
___________________________________________________________________________ 


> 
> Arthur Ryman 
> 
> DE, Chief Architect, Reporting &
> Portfolio Strategy and Management
> IBM Software, Rational 
> 
> Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From:
> John Arwe <johnarwe at us.ibm.com>
> To:
> oslc-core at open-services.net
> Date:
> 04/16/2012 08:15 AM
> Subject:
> Re: [oslc-core] Need for a new specification phase/status: "deprecated"
> Sent by:
> oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> 
> 
> from>         then such a Specification can         left this state 
> to>         then such a Specification can be         left this state 
> "Abandoned" might be a more accurate term *for the spec state*, but no 
> emotional attachment to the choice. 
> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
> 


_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net