[oslc-core] Need for a new specification phase/status: "deprecated"

[Arthur Ryman]

There should be a "Suspended" state. Deprecated implies that something 
newer replaced it.

Regards, 
___________________________________________________________________________ 

Arthur Ryman 

DE, Chief Architect, Reporting &
Portfolio Strategy and Management
IBM Software, Rational 

Toronto Lab | +1-905-413-3077 (office) | +1-416-939-5063 (mobile) 





From:
John Arwe <johnarwe at us.ibm.com>
To:
oslc-core at open-services.net
Date:
04/16/2012 08:15 AM
Subject:
Re: [oslc-core] Need for a new specification phase/status: "deprecated"
Sent by:
oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net



from>         then such a Specification can         left this state 
to>         then such a Specification can be         left this state 
"Abandoned" might be a more accurate term *for the spec state*, but no 
emotional attachment to the choice. 
Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario 
_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net