[oslc-core] DRAFT of minor updates to RM 2.0 specification ready for review

[John Arwe]

> Unless I hear of objections by email I will action the above on 30 
September and make these changes final. 
Process issue: part of a transparent process is avoiding what are or even 
might reasonably appear to be unilateral decisions, even "small" ones like 
length of review period should be made at a working group meeting (Core, 
in this case).  As I remember the last Core meeting, we agreed that you'd 
draft the diffs and Core members would review via email, nothing about 
length of review period (miss on our part)  
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreMeeting20110921 .
Especially when we're treading in new territory (adding to an existing 
spec w/o a full new-version spec cycle), we need everyone to be 
comfortable with events and transparency + clarity are key.

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20111004/10185098/attachment-0003.html>