[oslc-core] was dcterms:type intentionally omitted from Core's common properties?

[John Arwe]

Not having been around for the bulk of the 2.0 spec stream development, 
I'm wondering if I should/not read anything (and if I should, what/how 
much) into which Dublin Core elements were explicitly listed as common 
properties [1] vs those that were omitted.  dcterms:type provides a nice 
example.  It is in Dublin Core [2], it is used in CM 2.0 [3], but it is 
not in OSLC-common.

[1] 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixA?sortcol=table;up=#Dublin_Core_Properties
[2] http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-type
[3] 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecificationV2?sortcol=table;up=#Resource_ChangeRequest 
under OSLC CM: Start of additional properties 

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20111115/9b68b902/attachment-0003.html>