[oslc-core] Attachments

[Dave]

On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Scott Bosworth <bosworth at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Sounds to me like there is an emerging consensus that we not take this up as
> a core workgroup or a core spec topic, for the various reasons already
> stated. I think that's fine, but we should recognize that we have a narrower
> and specific set of use cases/needs expressed by several CM workgroup
> members. I suggest that we push this topic back to the CM workgroup to
> decide actions they want/need to take and that the core workgroup stay
> appraised of progress they make in experimenting or spec'ing of CM specific
> approaches. Steve, does this make sense to you?

+1

- Dave



>> From: Martin Nally/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
>> To: Nick Crossley/Irvine/IBM at IBMUS
>> Cc: oslc-core at open-services.net
>> Date: 02/07/2011 06:07 PM
>> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] Attachments
>> Sent by: oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
>>
>> To me this sounds like there is not a sufficiently compelling reason to
>> specify anything new, beyond perhaps explaining how Dave's non-design can
>> be applied to attachments. How would we poll the stakeholders to test that
>> assertion?
>>
>> Best regards, Martin
>>
>> Martin Nally, IBM Fellow
>> CTO and VP, IBM Rational
>> tel: +1 (714)472-2690
>>
>>
>
>
> Scott Bosworth | IBM Rational CTO Team | bosworth at us.ibm.com |
> 919.486.2197(w) | 919.244.3387(m) | 919.254.5271(f)
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
>
>