[oslc-core] ChangeLog Prifile Naming

[Samit Mehta]

+1 for Resource Tracking (since it is a client perspective)

One more client perspective suggestion: "Resource Probing"

This may already be the plan:  I would suggest keeping specs for Change 
Log and the Security separate.  It is conceivable that domain specs may 
adopt / require one and not the other.
____________________________________________
Samit Mehta
IBM Rational Software - Business Development




oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net wrote on 04/01/2011 11:07:15 AM:

> From: Martin Nally/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-core at open-services.net
> Cc: oslc-core at open-services.net, oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> Date: 04/01/2011 11:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] ChangeLog Prifile Naming
> Sent by: oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> How about "Resource Publishing Profile"? "Content Publishing" sounds to 
me
> too much like content management, for which there are many standards
> already. "Resource Tracking Profile" sounds weaker to me, but has the
> advantage that it's named from the client perspective rather than the
> provider perspective, which is usually preferable.
> 
> Best regards, Martin
> 
> Martin Nally, IBM Fellow
> CTO and VP, IBM Rational
> tel: +1 (714)472-2690
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20110401/c1d29b0f/attachment-0003.html>