[oslc-core] Issue: do we really need 4 resource value-types?

[Nick Crossley]

We use Resource, Inline Resource, and Local Inline Resource in SCM (I 
think!)

Nick.



From:   Dave <snoopdave at gmail.com>
To:     oslc-core <oslc-core at open-services.net>
Date:   05/28/2010 08:08 AM
Subject:        [oslc-core] Issue: do we really need 4 resource 
value-types?
Sent by:        oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net



I like the four value-types that Arthur proposed and they've been in
the spec draft for some time now, but I wonder: do we need them all?

   See also -> 
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/2010-April/000111.html


Here's an issue I just raised on the issues page:

   1 OPEN We have defined value-types Resource, Inline Resource, Local
Resource and Local Inline Resource. Do we really truly need all of
these types? We want representation to be simple and use flat
name/value property model, so should we give them all these value
types? Can we live without Local Resource? What about Local Inline
Resource? Do we have use cases to support these things?

      * Response: pending...

Any opinions on this?

Thanks,
Dave

_______________________________________________
Oslc-Core mailing list
Oslc-Core at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20100528/8302e9ae/attachment-0003.html>