[oslc-core] Splitting up the Core

Dave snoopdave at gmail.com
Wed May 12 09:39:32 EDT 2010


We do intend to have Turtle representation examples and, in fact, I'm
working on that today (using Jena to generate Turtle from our RDF/XML
examples).

- Dave


On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Olivier Berger
<olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Le lundi 10 mai 2010 à 11:29 -0400, Dave a écrit :
>> >From the start, I wanted one Core spec document because the old
>> broken-up OSLC v1 specs seemed to hard to follow, and hard to print
>> out for offline reading because there were so many parts. But now, the
>> Core spec seems too long, difficult to edit and too long to print out,
>> which is a shame because the "core" part of the Core spec is only
>> about 30 pages.
>>
>
> What about using turtle [0] or a similar easier to read (and more
> compact) form of RDF instead of XML/RDF ?
>
> Of course, some tools may be better implemented using XML, but for
> readability by humans, it might help to have turtle examples instead.
>
> And I believe some concepts might be better understood with clearest
> possible RDF, considering how difficult it has become to understand some
> current discussions in -core.
>
> Just my 2 cents,
>
> [0]: http://www.w3.org/TeamSubmission/turtle/
> --
> Olivier BERGER <olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu>
> http://www-public.it-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
> Ingénieur Recherche - Dept INF
> Institut TELECOM, SudParis (http://www.it-sudparis.eu/), Evry (France)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
>




More information about the Oslc-Core mailing list