[oslc-core] Need for an XML literal value type

[Steve K Speicher]

Dave <snoopdave at gmail.com> wrote on 03/19/2010 01:26:53 PM:
> I do have a couple more questions for the WG:
> 
> - Should we offer any guidance to folks who wish to store HTML5 or
> HTML 4.0.1 content as a property value?

Perhaps, if the statement is to just use XML Literal constructs CDATA, may 
be enough.  Or a simple encoding type, base-64 I believe was suggested 
could work too.
 
> - Instead of an "XML Literal" value-type, what if we allowed only
> "XHTML Literal"? -- thus allowing literal XML only for rich text.

I think just a simple "XML Literal" type would be enough.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20100323/3894f7f8/attachment-0003.html>