[oslc-core] Proposed change to JSON formatting rules for Query responses

[Dave]

Here's my initial reaction:
- I argued for having a query shape, but we decided not to do so.
- Each domain will need to define what the shape of query results will
be, if there is a result collection, etc.

Let's cover this one in the workgroup meeting today.

Thanks,
- Dave



On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> Current JSON guidance [1] doesn't address what the result array name
> should be.
>
> I recommend that we use "oslc:results" array, like for delegated UIs [2]
>
> See also example at [3], how does a consumer know to look for array named
> "oslc_blog:comment" in this example.  I think it would be best to use a
> general OSLC property.
> So this example would become:
>  "oslc:results" : [{
>       "oslc:qname" : "oslc_blog:BlogComment",
>       "rdf:resource" : "http://example.com/blogs/comment/346",
>    },
>
> [1]
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreRepresentationsGuidance#Guidelines_for_JSON
> [2]
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreSpecification#Delegated_User_Interface_Dialogs
> [3]
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OSLCCoreSpecAppendixD#Query_Resource
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
>