[oslc-core] ordered properties

[Dave]

We tabled the issue of ordered properties in the Core spec, but this
could be a good idea for a separate guidance document.

- Dave



On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 1:10 PM, James Conallen <jconallen at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> In the section "Order of property values insignificant" it states that
> "providers MUST not place any significance on the ordering of property
> values in representations."
>
> Would it be appropriate to append to this some guidance on how ordering
> should be achieved (i.e. rdf:Seq)?
>
> Otherwise we might end up with many different ways to imply ordering.
>
> <jim/>
>
> jim conallen
> jconallen at us.ibm.com
> Rational Software, IBM Software Group
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
>
>