[oslc-core] OSLC representations change proposal

[David Johnson]

Thanks for the feedback. I responded on one point:


On Jul 20, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Steve K Speicher wrote:
> Some initial feedback/thoughts below.  Can discuss more at tomorrow's 
> meeting.
> 
>> 2) We remove the step-by-step instructions for generating RDF/XML,
>> JSON and Atom from the Core spec because they are not well specified
>> or widely implemented enough to be in the final OSLC Core
>> specification.
> 
> Agree for RDF/XML.
> For JSON and Atom, I believe an algorithm/approach/guidance is still 
> needed since there are no well-defined or industry standards to use.

I agree too, but... we will still have the algorithm approach. They will be in the guidance with the RDF/XML rules. The JSON algorithm has the same flaws as the RDF/XML subset algorithm, it's a new and non-standard format that needs better specs, more implementation experience, etc. I don't see why it should not be treated in the same way.

- Dave