[oslc-core] Finalizing Link Guidance

[Dave]

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Ian Green1 <ian.green at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>  - I'm not sure that these are really "two ways".  More that the second is
> an extension of the first. This is important since it means that consumers
> that don't care or don't understand link properties can reasonably be
> expected to ignore them, and that queries which don't talk about link
> properties don't need to change when link properties are added or removed.

Good point. I did some rewriting and removed the "two ways" language.


> - How about the RDF terms subject/object rather than source/target?

Yes, that is better. Done.


> - i suggest relaxing "there is an rdf:Description element" since such an
> element need not exist - it could be given some rdf:type and thus be
> abbreviated as part of the RDF/XML representation.

I removed the sentence that you are referring to. It was not really helpful.

Thanks for the feedback.

- Dave