[oslc-core] Question on oslc:Publisher

[Dave]

Yes, this makes sense. If we mean URN, then value type should be
Resource and not String.

Steve: do we really want this to be a URN? If so, do you think the
change is worth risking / inconveniencing ongoing implementations?

Thanks,
- Dave



On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:17 PM, Ian Green1 <ian.green at uk.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> http://open-services.net/ns/core#Publisher
>
> requires a String valued dcterms:identifier.  Description states that this
> is a URN.  If it is to be a URN, then the value-type should be Resource
> with an unspecified Range, I would argue.  Changing the description is
> another option.
>
>
> best wishes,
>    -ian
>
> ian.green at uk.ibm.com (Ian Green1/UK/IBM at IBMGB)
> Chief Software Architect, Requirements Definition and Management
> IBM Rational
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
>