[oslc-core] Shapeless query result example

[Dave]

We talked about the need for an example that shows what a query
resource would look like if there were no Resource Shape provided by
the Query Capability. Arthur suggested that we do not need to define a
query result type or a member property, and could simply return
triples about the result URIs plus an oslc:ResponseInfo resource (if
needed).

Here's an example of that form, which fits in with the examples in
Appendix B and validates: http://tinyurl.com/26tetbv

1:
2: <rdf:RDF
3:    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
4:    xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
5:    xmlns:oslc="http://open-services.net/ns/core#"
6:    xmlns:oslc_blog="http://open-services.net/ns/bogus/blogs#">
7:
8:     <oslc:ResponseInfo
rdf:about="http://example.com/query?oslc.from [...] entry/1>">
9:         <dcterms:title>Blog Service Query Results for term
[remote]</dcterms:title>
10:     </oslc:ResponseInfo>
11:
12:
13:     <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/5">
14:         <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
15:         <dcterms:title>Comment #5</dcterms:title>
16:     </rdf:Description>
17:
18:     <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/4">
19:         <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
20:         <dcterms:title>Comment #4</dcterms:title>
21:     </rdf:Description>
22:
23:     <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/2">
24:               <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
25:         <dcterms:title>Comment #2</dcterms:title>
26:     </rdf:Description>
27:
28:     <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/1">
29:               <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
30:         <dcterms:title>Comment #1</dcterms:title>
31:     </rdf:Description>
32:
33:     <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://example.com/blogs/comment/3">
34:         <!-- Comment propery values, etc. -->
35:         <dcterms:title>Comment #3</dcterms:title>
36:     </rdf:Description>
37:
38:        <!-- etc. etc. -->
39:
40: </rdf:RDF>


Look correct? Any objections to or concerns about adding this to Appendix B?

Thanks,
Dave