[oslc-core] OSLC Domain Version String usage and identification

[Steve K Speicher]

> Do we have some documented versioning/upgrade use cases that can help
> us make a decision here?

I took this action and I have a start of something for CM at 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmResourceEvolutionToV2

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645


oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net wrote on 04/27/2010 08:35:39 AM:

> From: Dave <snoopdave at gmail.com>
> To: Nick Crossley/Irvine/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: oslc-core at open-services.net
> Date: 04/27/2010 08:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-core] OSLC Domain Version String usage and 
identification
> Sent by: oslc-core-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:01 PM, Nick Crossley <ncrossley at us.ibm.com> 
wrote:
> > But this does not seem to address the use cases outlined when we 
described
> > why two version strings appear to be needed.  Are we deciding not to 
address
> > those use cases, and if so, why not?
> 
> That's a good point, Nick and we do have an open Action Item from the
> last Core WG meeting
> (http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreMeetings04212010): to
> round up some versioning/upgrade string use cases. We think tere are
> some on the wiki, but I did some poking around the wiki and did not
> find any.
> 
> Do we have some documented versioning/upgrade use cases that can help
> us make a decision here?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Dave
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20100427/5362f96c/attachment-0003.html>