[oslc-core] [oslc-cm] Proposed Discussion/Comment resource model for inclusion into Core

[Steve K Speicher]

> Are Comments something that is Core or something
> that is common?

Yes :)   I believe common themes/patterns from domains are identified, 
they can be addressed in some core way.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645


Dave <snoopdave at gmail.com> wrote on 04/27/2010 01:33:19 PM:

> From: Dave <snoopdave at gmail.com>
> To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: oslc-core <oslc-core at open-services.net>, oslc-cm at open-services.net
> Date: 04/27/2010 01:33 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-cm] Proposed Discussion/Comment resource model 
> for  inclusion into Core
> 
> No objection here.
> 
> ... Although it does make me wonder if we need to clean up the
> Core/Common areas of the wiki and perhaps draw some distinction
> between common and core (or drop the term "common" if it has become
> redundant w/Core). Are Comments something that is Core or something
> that is common?
> 
> - Dave
> 
> 
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 12:35 PM, Steve K Speicher 
> <sspeiche at us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > The CM workgroup has defined a resource model for Discussions and 
Comments
> > see:  http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmComments
> >
> > This appears to be very applicable to many domains.  I'd propose we 
move
> > this to Core spec/guidance and it live in the core namespace.   Any
> > objections?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Oslc-Cm mailing list
> > Oslc-Cm at open-services.net
> > http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net
> >
> >
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20100427/5ef76e25/attachment-0003.html>