[oslc-core] OSLC properties oslc:scope

[Robert Elves]

+1 That makes sense to me.

-Rob


On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com>wrote:

> Regarding the resolution of this issue:
>
> http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreV1Issues
> RESOLVED recommend renaming oslc:context to oslc:scope due to potential
> missunderstanding in ALM industry (*RobertElves*<http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/RobertElves>03/30/2010)
> *Response* Done. We now use oslc:scope and describe it as "The scope of a
> resource is a link to the resource's ServiceProvider*?*<http://open-services.net/bin/edit/Main/ServiceProvider?topicparent=Main.OslcCoreV1Issues>."
>
> Since this property is a link to the ServiceProvider resource, why don't we
> just call it oslc:serviceProvider ?   I think oslc:scope could still be
> misleading: change request is scoped to this iteration, etc.
>
> Robert, since you raised this issue what are your thoughts?
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Core mailing list
> Oslc-Core at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-core_open-services.net
>
>


-- 
Robert Elves
Tasktop Developer, http://tasktop.com/
Mylyn Committer, http://eclipse.org/mylyn
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/attachments/20100412/6d2f6527/attachment-0003.html>