[oslc-cm] [Oslc-Automation] Some comments on Actions spec (most from CM perspective)
John Arwe
johnarwe at us.ibm.com
Tue Mar 4 07:34:31 EST 2014
The original problem was:
> <1>
> # other properties would go here
> oslc:action [
> a oslc:StateTransitionAction, oslc:Action ;
> oslc_auto:desiredState x:Suspended ;
> dcterms:title "Suspend work on this item" ;
> # bindings would go here
> ]
> oslc:action [
> a reporting:FlagAsInappropriateAction, oslc:Action ;
> oslc_auto:desiredState x:Suspended ;
> dcterms:title "Flag as inappropriate" ;
> # bindings would go here
> ]
> .
>
Assuming for the moment we keep oslc:StateTransitionAction, what is the
explanation for its absence on the second action?
Best Regards, John
Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20140304/969f02b0/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Oslc-Cm
mailing list