[oslc-cm] [Oslc-Automation] Some comments on Actions spec (most from CM perspective)

John Arwe johnarwe at us.ibm.com
Tue Mar 4 07:34:31 EST 2014


The original problem was:

> <1> 
>  # other properties would go here 
>  oslc:action [ 
>    a oslc:StateTransitionAction, oslc:Action ; 
>    oslc_auto:desiredState x:Suspended ; 
>    dcterms:title "Suspend work on this item" ; 
>    # bindings would go here 
>  ] 
>  oslc:action [ 
>    a reporting:FlagAsInappropriateAction, oslc:Action ; 
>    oslc_auto:desiredState x:Suspended ; 
>    dcterms:title "Flag as inappropriate" ; 
>    # bindings would go here 
>  ] 
> . 
> 

Assuming for the moment we keep oslc:StateTransitionAction, what is the 
explanation for its absence on the second action?


Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20140304/969f02b0/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Oslc-Cm mailing list