[oslc-cm] oslc:StateTransitionAction

[Martin P Pain]

As we seemed to be agreeing on the usefulness of this being 
common/reusable, I have added a section for the oslc:StateTransitionAction 
rdf:type value to the Core Actions spec [1].

I have also added a section to the Automation 2.1 spec wiki page to track 
changes we want to make to the vocab [2], and put the proposed new 
description for oslc_auto:desiredState there.

If John & Steve could have a quick review that would be great.


[1] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions-on-RDF-resources/#Resource.3A-StateTransitionAction

[2] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-Specification-Version-2.1/#Appendix-D.3A-Changes


Martin Pain
Software Developer - Green Hat
Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel
Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation WG joint chair

E-mail: martinpain at uk.ibm.com
Find me on:  and within IBM on:  




IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU

"Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on 
30/01/2014 18:40:43:

> From: John Arwe <johnarwe at us.ibm.com>
> To: oslc-automation at open-services.net, 
> Cc: oslc-cm at open-services.net
> Date: 30/01/2014 18:40
> Subject: Re: [Oslc-Automation] Some comments on Actions spec (most 
> from CM perspective)
> Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> I like fewer terms (one desired state)... the resource shape (aka 
> resource definition table text) is where the "is likely to be an X" 
> should live.  That's domain-specific, so it does not pollute the 
> vocabulary term's definition. 
> Domain CM reusing a Domain!=CM term might cause some "ick, it's a 
> cross-domain dependency" knee-jerk reactions, but if we're 
> comfortable re-using DC then Automation is no different in 
> principle, i.e. while we might hate cross-domain SPEC dependencies, 
> we should be completely comfortable with cross-domain VOCABULARY re-use. 

> I tend to split the difference on the descriptions; I've seen in 
> many contexts that when we try to be completely generic, the result 
> is incomprehensible to anyone not in That Meeting(s), so I add an a 
> specific concrete example (clearly marked as such) alongside it.  I.e. 
> <oslc_auto:desiredState > 
>  a rdfs:Property ; 
>  rdfs:comment "The intended (domain- or provider-dependant) value of
> a resource's (domain-dependant) 'state' property after some (future,
> present or past) process, transition or change.  It is expected that
> this will be a resource reference to a definition of a valid state 
> on the service provider.   For example, in the OSLC Automation domain 
this is 
> used to indicate the desired state of the Automation Request based 
> on values defined in the OSLC Automation specification and, 
> optionally, by the service provider." ; 
>  rdfs:seeAlso oslc:StateTransitionAction ; 
> .

> Best Regards, John
> 
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages 
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Automation mailing list
> Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
> 
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net


Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20140204/c577a901/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 518 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20140204/c577a901/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1208 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20140204/c577a901/attachment-0001.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20140204/c577a901/attachment.gif>