[oslc-cm] Providing additional types of "change request"-like resources
Paul McMahan
pmcmahan at us.ibm.com
Thu Nov 29 14:14:57 EST 2012
+1, I would also like to suggest QualityManagementTask and ReviewTask as
well.
Best wishes,
Paul McMahan
IBM Rational
"Oslc-Cm" <oslc-cm-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on 11/29/2012 01:48:16
PM:
> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-cm at open-services.net
> Date: 11/29/2012 01:48 PM
> Subject: [oslc-cm] Providing additional types of "change request"-
> like resources
> Sent by: "Oslc-Cm" <oslc-cm-bounces at open-services.net>
>
> Currently, the CM 2.0 defines only 1 rdf:type of resource and we all know
> and love that as oslc_cm:ChangeRequest.
>
> There are many other "kinds" of change requests, today we help guide some
> scenarios that are looking for these kinds of resources by using
> oslc:usage with some known values [1],[2].
>
> Not having these usage identifiers be rdf:types has always been a little
> odd, for a number of reasons:
> - Typical way of querying and inferring the type of resource relied on
> non-standard ways
> - Associating dialogs, factories, queries without these type is a bit
off.
>
> We've already proven the need for these usage/type things. So the names
> (ids) and concepts are still valid.
>
> My proposal:
> In 3.0, introduce these as additional subtypes (rdfs:subClassOf
> oslc_cm:ChangeRequest) as first class OSLC-CM resource types: Defect,
> PlanItem, Task, RequirementsChangeRequest.
>
> [1] -
> http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/2010-
> June/000172.html
> [2] -
>
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecificationV2#Usage_Identifiers
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
> http://open-services.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Cm mailing list
> Oslc-Cm at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net
>
More information about the Oslc-Cm
mailing list