[oslc-cm] OSLC-CM 2.0 Implementation reports -- in consolidated Google Doc

Andre Weinand weinand at acm.org
Tue Nov 23 18:12:59 EST 2010


Hi Steve,

Good stuff. This table is very helpful.

One thing to consider is to vary the colorcoding based on the "level" column.
A "N" for a "MUST" level is definitively a red, but a "N" for a "MAY" is more an orange or yellow.
With this colorcoding it becomes more obvious where the important gaps are.

Thanks,
--andre


On 23.11.2010, at 22:51, Steve K Speicher wrote:

> I am in the process of migrating the CM 2.0 Implementation Reports [1] 
> into a unified table [2].
> This format seems much more appealing to me.  I have defined a set of 
> rules to auto-color the cells so we can better see the gaps: Y vs N vs P 
> (partial) support.  I have also included a few more rows that I think 
> would be useful to capture (they are now blank).
> 
> Please verify what I have done.  I believe some of the reports are even a 
> little dated at the moment.
> 
> Feedback most welcome. 
> 
> Also, please send me your email to use to register you as an editor to 
> this document.
> 
> [1] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmImplementationReports
> [2] - 
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AsgaoPBj7epTdEw1MW41OEJmRlozQlpMM1Rxel9KRUE&hl=en&authkey=CKfzkPAB
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Cm mailing list
> Oslc-Cm at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net





More information about the Oslc-Cm mailing list