[oslc-cm] OSLC-CM 2.0 Implementation reports -- in consolidated Google Doc
Andre Weinand
weinand at acm.org
Tue Nov 23 18:12:59 EST 2010
Hi Steve,
Good stuff. This table is very helpful.
One thing to consider is to vary the colorcoding based on the "level" column.
A "N" for a "MUST" level is definitively a red, but a "N" for a "MAY" is more an orange or yellow.
With this colorcoding it becomes more obvious where the important gaps are.
Thanks,
--andre
On 23.11.2010, at 22:51, Steve K Speicher wrote:
> I am in the process of migrating the CM 2.0 Implementation Reports [1]
> into a unified table [2].
> This format seems much more appealing to me. I have defined a set of
> rules to auto-color the cells so we can better see the gaps: Y vs N vs P
> (partial) support. I have also included a few more rows that I think
> would be useful to capture (they are now blank).
>
> Please verify what I have done. I believe some of the reports are even a
> little dated at the moment.
>
> Feedback most welcome.
>
> Also, please send me your email to use to register you as an editor to
> this document.
>
> [1] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmImplementationReports
> [2] -
> https://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=0AsgaoPBj7epTdEw1MW41OEJmRlozQlpMM1Rxel9KRUE&hl=en&authkey=CKfzkPAB
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Cm mailing list
> Oslc-Cm at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net
More information about the Oslc-Cm
mailing list