[oslc-cm] Specification Versioning

Steve K Speicher sspeiche at us.ibm.com
Wed Jul 28 12:30:23 EDT 2010


Thanks Sam, per our discussion today we agreed to make that change.

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645

> From: Samuel Padgett/Durham/IBM at IBMUS
> To: oslc-cm at open-services.net
> Date: 07/28/2010 10:24 AM
> Subject: [oslc-cm] Specification Versioning
> Sent by: oslc-cm-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> 
> The OSLC Core spec says providers MUST respond with the OSLC-Core-
> Version header set to 2.0 if returning a 2.0 resource representation
> [1]. In the CM spec, this is only a SHOULD [2]. I propose we change 
> the SHOULD to a MUST to align with the Core spec. 
> 
> Best Regards, 
> Sam 
> 
> [1] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/OslcCoreSpecification?
> sortcol=table;up=#Supporting_pre_Core_clients 
> [2] http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecificationV2?
> sortcol=table;up=#Specification_Versioning
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Cm mailing list
> Oslc-Cm at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-cm_open-services.net





More information about the Oslc-Cm mailing list