[oslc-cm] oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement
Steve K Speicher
sspeiche at us.ibm.com
Mon Apr 5 08:58:41 EDT 2010
Olivier Berger <olivier.berger at it-sudparis.eu> wrote on 04/02/2010
03:57:52 AM:
> Le lundi 29 mars 2010 à 09:56 -0400, Steve K Speicher a écrit :
> > "Wolf, Timo" <timowolf at siemens.com> wrote on 03/29/2010 08:11:13 AM:
> > >
> > > When saving a link in RTC, RTC tries to store a back link to the
> > > Provider side, using the property
> > "oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement" .
> > >
> > > I actually figured out what is going on and implemented the Provider
> > > part, but I did not find anything about
> > > oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement in the OSLC spec.
> > > Is this missing or can you give me a link to the related spec in V1
> > or V2?
> > >
> >
> > This property 'oslc_cm:relatedChangeManagement' is a proprietary
> > extension added by the RTC 2.0 product (not part of OSLC-CM V1). You
> > may inquiry on a http://jazz.netforum for details on it.
> >
> > We are looking at providing this property in a V2 specification,
> > looking to complete this work soon:
> > http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmResourceDefinitionsV2
>
> So shouldn't RTC use a custom prefix for such a proprietary extension ?
The recommendation is to add custom properties in a non-OSLC namespace.
> Should there be some versioning also in such prefixes to distinguish
> between V1, V2, etc ?
We are working on our versions on the V2 ChangeRequest definition now. But
would expect the namespaces to evolve to include increased version
strings.
Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20100405/071a2c7a/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Oslc-Cm
mailing list