[OSLC-CM] OSLC-CM Working Group Minutes 25 November 2009
Steve K Speicher
sspeiche at us.ibm.com
Wed Nov 25 14:05:45 EST 2009
Minutes at: http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings11252009
Attendees: SteveSpeicher, SofiaYeung, AndreWeinand, RobertElves,
MikKersten, MatsGothe, MarkRinger, SusanDuncan,
Regrets: ScottBosworth, OlivierBerger, SamLee, DenisTyrell, SamitMehta
Last minute agenda items
Review on outstanding Actions see CmMeetingsActions
Reiterating need for ALL to review scenarios and needs on certain
properties, see CmCommonProperties
Mylyn OSLC Java API contribution has been made by Tasktop: RobertElves,
MikKersten
Review of CmOfRequirements
Discussed the difference with scenario of implementing a requirement,
creation of change request and linking.
Initial read shows these potential gaps in CM: determining completeness of
CR and presence of changeset (as a resource and a property of CR)
WG concensus that this scenario will be included in CM 2.0 scope
Concern was raised with coordination RmHome (working with topic lead on
this)
OAuth discussion
MikKersten, RobertElves have not encountered OAuth in the many connectors
they support, prominant one is HTTP-basic
ACTION: RobertElves to produce survey of what type of auth model they've
encountered (kind and frequency).
Noted that their may be classes of integrations to may require OAuth
(3-legged), while other scenarios (2-legged) can rely on HTTP-Basic
Review of 1.0 spec comments
WG agreed with responses proposed
Similar comments apply to response to Ian's comments
Review of CmCommonProperties mapping effort
GoogleDocs? spreadsheet updated with "Frequency" column (B) and color
coded to highlight commonality. Many WG members found this format to be
very useful
Discussion around need to carefully define Project and Component:
suggestions were around defining them in generic terms as "context"
(Project) and "subtext" (Component) for hierarchal systems, though there
may be a need for tagged-based model (Google code). Will queue up for a
future WG topic.
ACTION: All WG participants to validate entries
Next Steps:
WG participants to validate entries and scenarios involved
SteveSpeicher to propose an CR 2.0 definition based on frequency of use +
scenario needs
Next meetings:
9-Dec 12:00 PM Eastern
16-Dec 12:00 PM Eastern (added)
Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-cm_open-services.net/attachments/20091125/38dc92c9/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Oslc-Cm
mailing list