[Oslc-Automation] Final proposals for OSLC Actions 2.0 - please +1

[Steve K Speicher]

+1 

- Steve

> From: Martin P Pain <martinpain at uk.ibm.com>
> To: oslc-automation at open-services.net
> Date: 10/09/2014 11:57 AM
> Subject: [Oslc-Automation] Final proposals for OSLC Actions 2.0 - please 
+1
> Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net>
> 
> ---------- 
> These are the final proposals to go into OSLC Actions 2.0. Please read 
them 
> and +1 if you are fine for them to be resolved as stated. If there are 
no 
> objections in a week, they will be considered resolved by the WG. 
> ---------- 
> 
> Ian.II.7.5: literal values for ParameterInstance rdf:value property in 
fixed
> body pattern. 
> Proposal: "Change the resource shape (resource table) for Actions' reuse 
of 
> ParameterInstance [1] to exclude literals, and make the HTTP Request 
with 
> Fixed Body interaction pattern explicitly require a resource as the 
object 
> of the rdf:value property. Also remove any other text referring to 
literal 
> values in this context." 
> (Resource shapes/tables set expectations, not compliance. 
Implementations 
> are still free to use literal values, but the spec does not state how a 
> consumer should interpret that.) 
> 
> Ian.II.8.2: Identifier for profiles; Ian.II.9.4: Identifier for 
“standard 
> restrictions” 
> Proposal: Add identifiers (listed below) for each interaction pattern, 
> identifying them in the spec as in the image at [2], except that: they 
are 
> never to be used as link text (to avoid the appearance of being parts of 
a 
> URI), they should always be rendered enclosed in quotes (to help 
reinforce 
> that they are strings not URIs). The "contained in profiles" and "used 
by" 
> lists should either link to the other spec sections by name (not 
identifier)
> or in the format: name ("identifier"). 
> Pattern: HTTP request with empty body ("pattern-http-empty-body") 
> Pattern: HTTP request with Resource Shape to describe the request body 
> ("pattern-http-resource-shape") 
> Pattern: HTTP request with fixed body ("pattern-http-fixed-body") 
> Pattern: Automation Request ("pattern-automation-request") 
> Pattern: Delegated UI dialog for immediate execution 
("pattern-action-dialog") 
> Pattern: Delegated UI dialog for later execution ("pattern-delegated-
> execution-dialog") 
> Pattern: Automation Creation Factory 
("pattern-automation-creation-factory") 
> Profile: POST RDF described by a OSLC Resource Shape to the Action 
resource 
> ("profile-action-shape-post") 
> Profile: Create an Automation Request ("profile-automation-request") 
> 
> Ian.II.7.4: oslc:label & “action dialog”. 
> Proposal: "Add a link to the immediate execution action dialog 
interaction 
> pattern [3] in the introductory paragraph above the resource shape for 
the 
> "results" construct [4]". 
> 
> 2014-September/000838: Remove requirements on RDF/XML. 
> Proposal: Remove the sentence "Providers MUST support RDF/XML (i.e., 
> application/rdf+xml) representations of these resources. Providers MAY 
> provide representations beyond those necessary to conform to this 
> specification, using standard HTTP content negotiation. If the client 
does 
> not indicate a preference, application/rdf+xml MUST be returned." and 
the 
> two links to RDF/XML in the "references" section. 
> 
> ---------- 
> These proposals have been public for a number of weeks with no 
objections, 
> so are hereby considered resolved as proposed: 
> ---------- 
> 
> 2014-September/000834: Location of definition of "futureActions" 
predicate 
> and link from concrete actions to the future action they correspond to. 
> Proposal: "Change namespace for new futureActions and executes 
predicates to
> be core, leave all other spec locations & text as-is." [5] 
> 
> Ian.II.8.1: Complying with multiple profiles simultaneously. 
> Proposal: "In the Specification profile definitions section we change 
the 
> language from “Action bindings” (plural) to singular." 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [1] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Actions-2.0/#Resource_ParameterInstance 

> [2] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/622c751da3c971bab5d93ad0790ef8c0 
> [3] http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Actions-2.0/#pattern-immed-dialog 

> [4] http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Actions-2.0/#Resource.3A-results 
> [5] 
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/
> 2014-September/000845.html
> 
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number 
741598. 
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 
3AU
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Automation mailing list
> Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
> 
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20141015/d1e72dc3/attachment-0003.html>