[Oslc-Automation] Core Actions updated (was: This week's meeting)

[John Arwe]

Reminder to anyone on Core who said they'd review after Innovate ... it's 
after Innovate now, tick tock  ;-)


Addressed the comments noted at [1], i.e.

Would be good to emphasis in the ActionDialog pattern why it is different 
though: 
Normative sentence saying provider SHOULD wait for action to complete
Non-normative note saying intended for short-running actions.
Non-normative note (or clarification of final sentence) saying that 
instead of returning a URI like a creation or selection dialog does, this 
dialog returns a verdict (or status) of the action’s execution.

It appears that someone took a pass at these already, I just polished it. 
But since those at [1] were unclear as to whether or not it was 
outstanding, (a) here is one audit trail (b) I added it to the change 
history in the document [2].  Aside from a single pair of ; to , editorial 
changes, all my edits were in section [3]



[1] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/AutomationMeetings20140515/#Minutes
[2] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions-on-RDF-resources/#Changes-during-2.0-convergence-phase
[3] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions-on-RDF-resources/#pattern-immed-dialog

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Cloud and Smarter Infrastructure OSLC Lead

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140611/11975a78/attachment.html>