[Oslc-Automation] OSLC Actions: URI to identify interaction patterns. Plus "templates" replacing "with RDF body" pattern
Martin P Pain
martinpain at uk.ibm.com
Tue Jan 14 05:47:53 EST 2014
Here is a doc containing some draft potential changes to the Actions spec.
The changes are driven by:
(1) having a single URI to identify each interaction pattern
(which means only having a single HTTP request pattern,
identifying the different ways of building content separately)
(2) re-using the idea of "templates" from automation for the "with
RDF body" case, to avoid solving the same problems (e.g.
content-type) twice.
(3) Also, it brings the "creation factory" interaction pattern
into Core, but John has now suggested we only define the
"AutoRequest Creation factory" pattern, so this would stay
in Automation.
However, as Creation Factories already have a predicate and
semantics for resource shapes, this draft moves the resource
shape pattern in to the Creation Factory one as that is already
(kind of) defined in the Core spec CF resource section.
Also, we might want resource shapes without the "creation"
semantics, so removing resource shapes from the HTTP pattern
is probably not a good idea.
Note that the profiles have changed to reflect the changed patterns. The
POST profile has got a little but more complicated, but hopefully not by
too much.
I'm not proposing these changes, they are there to prompt thought about
these three areas.
So my questions are:
(1) Does such a refactor to provide a single identifying URI (rdf:type
value) per interaction pattern (although we may do it differently than
this) make things better or worse?
(2) Is the reference to a common "templates" concept better than just
saying "serialize the RDF"?
(3) Is there any value in this sort of usage of CFs? (My answer: no, as we
may want resource shapes without the creation semantics, as defined
above).
So I guess my proposal is to take the changes related to points (1) and
(2), but with resource shapes as an alternative "request body type" under
the HTTP pattern, rather than as part of the CF pattern.
Do any of you you agree/disagree?
Martin Pain
Software Developer - Green Hat
Rational Test Virtualization Server, Rational Test Control Panel
Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration - Automation WG joint chair
E-mail: martinpain at uk.ibm.com
Find me on: and within IBM on:
IBM United Kingdom Limited
Registered in England and Wales with number 741598
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hants. PO6 3AU
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140114/b58d2193/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 518 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140114/b58d2193/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 1208 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140114/b58d2193/attachment-0001.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140114/b58d2193/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 2014-01-13 OSLC Actions spec - CF and HTTP impl pattern changes.odt
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 49947 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140114/b58d2193/attachment.odt>
More information about the Oslc-Automation
mailing list