[Oslc-Automation] use of http:headers

[John Arwe]

This is lurking at [1], just before the red text.  It used to be true, but 
I suspect no longer is true given what I see at [2] (to cite one example)


The HTTP Vocabulary in RDF 1.0 W3C Working Draft defines additional 
content for describing HTTP requests, like http:body and http:headers, 
that are not needed by Core Actions to address known scenarios. 
Implementations that need such extensions SHOULD re-use the W3C vocabulary 
instead of inventing their own, but client interoperability may be 
limited. 


[1] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions-on-RDF-resources/#Resource.3A-Request
[2] 
http://open-services.net/wiki/core/Exposing-arbitrary-actions-on-RDF-resources/#pattern-rdf-body

Best Regards, John

Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140113/9897921d/attachment-0003.html>