[Oslc-Automation] Final changes (hopefully) for Actions spec: desiredResult -> finalStatusLocation
John Arwe
johnarwe at us.ibm.com
Thu Apr 17 10:20:20 EDT 2014
> > I'm agnostic on which choice we make, functionally. My inner
> > minimalist leans towards pointing in text to Core, done.
> ... would you be happy for us to just exclude the
> finalStatusLocation from the deferred dialog binding?
I would lean toward the explicit ptr to Core. This occurs in the context
of a spec (Automation) where other (non-deferred) dialogs that create
Automation Requests expect the client to take different (additional)
actions in the case of a successful create - search for a corresponding
Result, and look *at that* for blah blah. Those additional actions, if
mistakenly applied to a deferred dialog's output, would lead to a client
hang (no Result ever appears, or if it's bundled with the Request it never
changes into 'finished' state).
But I can live with either the explicit ptr or silence.
Best Regards, John
Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20140417/c33d5b2a/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Oslc-Automation
mailing list