[Oslc-Automation] Regarding oslc_auto:verdict in OSLC automation spec

[Michael F Fiedler]

+1  I have optimistically updated the spec and will tee this up for
discussion in the next workgroup meeting.

Regards,
Mike

Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
fiedler at us.ibm.com
919-254-4170


                                                                           
             David N                                                       
             Brauneis/Raleigh/                                             
             IBM at IBMUS                                                  To 
             Sent by:                  Charles Rankin/Austin/IBM at IBMUS,    
             oslc-automation-b                                          cc 
             ounces at open-servi         oslc-automation at open-services.net,  
             ces.net                   oslc-automation-bounces at open-servic 
                                       es.net                              
                                                                   Subject 
             09/13/2012 04:22          Re: [Oslc-Automation] Regarding     
             PM                        oslc_auto:verdict in	OSLC    
                                       automation	spec                 
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           
                                                                           




I agree with Charles - I like the changes for pass -> passed, warn ->
warning, and fail -> failed but would prefer to see erroneous be error.

Regards,
David
____________________________________________________
David Brauneis
STSM, Rational Software Delivery Automation Chief Architect
email: brauneis at us.ibm.com | phone: 720-395-5659 | mobile: 919-656-0874



From:        Charles Rankin/Austin/IBM at IBMUS
To:        oslc-automation at open-services.net,
Date:        09/13/2012 03:17 PM
Subject:        Re: [Oslc-Automation] Regarding oslc_auto:verdict in OSLC
automation        spec
Sent by:        oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net



oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net wrote on 09/13/2012 09:34:09 AM:

> From: Xin Peng Liu <xinpengl at cn.ibm.com>
>
> I looked through the latest spec, and found for the several values of
> oslc_auto:verdict, seems not all of them are of the same part of
> speech, but for oslc_auto:state, the values are consistent to be
> adjective. I assume values of oslc_auto:verdict should all be adjective
> or noun (better adjective).

That sounds like a reasonable request

> If all adjective, then we get:
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#unavailable
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#passed
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#warning
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#failed
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#erroneous

I like this version better.  I definitely like changing pass->passed and
fail->failed.  I'm not keen on "erroneous".  I think that "error", while
not an adjective, actually reads well and feels better.  If you plug them
all into the sentence "The automation is in a/an <state> state", they all
read fine.

Charles Rankin_______________________________________________
Oslc-Automation mailing list
Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
_______________________________________________
Oslc-Automation mailing list
Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120914/c6ffc20f/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120914/c6ffc20f/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: pic53470.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 1255 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120914/c6ffc20f/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120914/c6ffc20f/attachment-0002.gif>