[Oslc-Automation] Regarding oslc_auto:verdict in OSLC automation spec

[Charles Rankin]

oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net wrote on 09/13/2012 09:34:09 AM:

> From: Xin Peng Liu <xinpengl at cn.ibm.com>
> 
> I looked through the latest spec, and found for the several values of 
> oslc_auto:verdict, seems not all of them are of the same part of 
> speech, but for oslc_auto:state, the values are consistent to be 
> adjective. I assume values of oslc_auto:verdict should all be adjective
> or noun (better adjective).

That sounds like a reasonable request

> If all adjective, then we get: 
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#unavailable 
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#passed 
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#warning 
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#failed 
> http://open-services.net/ns/auto#erroneous 

I like this version better.  I definitely like changing pass->passed and 
fail->failed.  I'm not keen on "erroneous".  I think that "error", while 
not an adjective, actually reads well and feels better.  If you plug them 
all into the sentence "The automation is in a/an <state> state", they all 
read fine.

Charles Rankin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120913/c6e016d5/attachment-0003.html>