[Oslc-Automation] New MUST in Core

[Michael F Fiedler]

I have provisionally updated the spec [1] to adopt the new language.
Please comment on this list if you have concerns or disagree with the
wording or compliance requirement.

[1] -
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-Specification-Version-2.0/#Compliance

Regards,
Mike

Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
fiedler at us.ibm.com
919-254-4170

"Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on
10/31/2012 07:50:57 AM:

> John Arwe/Poughkeepsie/IBM at IBMUS
> Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net>
>
> 10/31/2012 07:50 AM
>
> To
>
> oslc-automation at open-services.net,
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> [Oslc-Automation] New MUST in Core
>
> This [1] is *probably* not a big deal, but it does imply we need to
> update the compliance table at the beginning of the spec.
>
> I propose we simply accept the Core MUST without change.
>
> [1] http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-core_open-services.net/
> 2012-October/001506.html
> Best Regards, John
>
> Voice US 845-435-9470  BluePages
> Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Automation mailing list
> Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
>
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20121031/740ef3ce/attachment-0003.html>