[Oslc-Automation] Comments on latest draft of spec (minor)

[Michael F Fiedler]

Agree - this seemed like a bigger deal when we were discussing what the
version of the spec should be.   Stakeholders seem to be comfortable with
the rationale of making it v2.0 now.   The spec [1] has been updated to
incorporate this suggestion.

[1] -
http://open-services.net/wiki/automation/OSLC-Automation-Specification-Version-2.0/

Regards,
Mike

Michael Fiedler
IBM Rational Software
fiedler at us.ibm.com
919-254-4170

"Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net> wrote on
11/29/2012 08:41:48 PM:

> Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> Sent by: "Oslc-Automation" <oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net>
>
> 11/29/2012 08:41 PM
>
> To
>
> oslc-automation at open-services.net,
>
> cc
>
> Subject
>
> [Oslc-Automation] Comments on latest draft of spec (minor)
>
> The red, in your face, text in the beginning seems like an unnecessary
> level of notice for a minority of people who will need to know the naming

> history.
>
> I suggest these changes:
> - remove this text from this section and change to black, place it at end

> of intro section
> - insert into the "Previous Version" something more meaningful than N/A,
> such as "This specification is the initial version of an OSLC Automation
> specification." (and therefore removing from the previous statement).
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher
> IBM Rational Software
> OSLC - Lifecycle integration inspired by the web ->
> http://open-services.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-Automation mailing list
> Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
>
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20121130/f24a9024/attachment-0003.html>