[Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not known

Jing Qian jqian at us.ibm.com
Tue Jul 3 09:45:37 EDT 2012


Hi David,

Thanks for your reply.

I agree this is only an issue when a given server instance provides more
than one type of Automation.
But this may not be unique to only RQM, I think there could be other
product sharing the same issues, i.e. In theory, Build Forge could be an
automation provider for build as well as an automation provider for
provisioning.

So from consumer side, it would be nice if we have some kind of standard
way to deal with such situation.
One way would be to check for the optional AutomationType attribute if it
is set. And it is the provider's responsibility to set such this attribute
if they are providing more than one type of automation.   This attribute
does not need to be an enumeration field, it could be just a String field,
servers for "label" purpose.

Jing J. Qian

Development, Rational Quality Manager
Rational Software
IBM Software Group
4205 S. Miami Blvd.
Durham, NC 27703

Tel: 919-254-9455 T/L: 444-9455



|------------>
| From:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |David N Brauneis/Raleigh/IBM                                                                                                                      |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| To:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Jing Qian/New Haven/IBM at IBMUS,                                                                                                                    |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Cc:        |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |oslc-automation at open-services.net, oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net                                                                      |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Date:      |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |07/02/2012 05:38 PM                                                                                                                               |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|------------>
| Subject:   |
|------------>
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
  |Re: [Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is not	known                                                                     |
  >--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|




In my opinion this appears to be a problem of your own creation - you have
defined two different Automation Providers for different purposes in your
own product and now you are having a problem in presenting this to end
users.

But most of the Automation Providers are not defining themselves as an
Automation Provider multiple times in a single runtime instance... Are you
suggesting that we should define AutomationType as an enumeration for
AutomationPlan (since it would need to be an enumeration with predefined
well-known values it would have to be required). I have many concerns about
this since we would essentially be forcing every other product to make
changes and require end users to "type" their AutomationPlans in order to
simplify your usage scenario... And would would be defining the
AutomationTypes??? Most product could support numerous AutomationPlans that
might be in support of different (or multiple) types of activities.

This appears to be a unique RQM issue and not something that needs to be
added to the specification.

Regards,
David
____________________________________________________
David Brauneis
STSM, Rational Software Delivery Automation Chief Architect
email: brauneis at us.ibm.com | phone: 720-395-5659 | mobile: 919-656-0874




From:	Jing Qian/New Haven/IBM at IBMUS
To:	oslc-automation at open-services.net,
Date:	07/02/2012 05:17 PM
Subject:	[Oslc-Automation] Implementation issues when Automation type is
            not	known
Sent by:	oslc-automation-bounces at open-services.net



Hi,

In a previous discussion, Pramod has proposed to a oslc_auto:automationType
attribute, but there is some objection to it,

Inactive hide details for see the thread here -
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2012-June/
see the thread here -
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2012-June/000182.html

see the thread here -
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2012-June/000182.html
      Automation plan: We don't have oslc_auto:automationType attribute.
      Without
      this we can't distinguish whether Automation is for build, test,
      deployment, cloud etc.. I think this needs to be typed.

      <dnb>I actually do not agree with an approach that types the
      automation, there are some
      automation plans that might perform one or more of those different
      types
      as a part of the workflow (think a continuous integration or
      continuous
      delivery product - i.e., DevOps)... How would you characterize those?

      Also, some automation providers will exist that can support more than
      one
      type of automation and do not need them to be separated. What do we
      gain
      by forcing this?
      </dnb>

      <pchandor>I think when a AutomationPlan represents a group of
      Automations
      (like TestSuite in RQM, workflow in DevOps), it might make sense to
      call
      them "complex" type. Consider a scenario like user is defining a
      workflow
      in RTC, that when a build automation is completed, wants to run a
      Test
      Automation. When user will query automation from the automation
      provider
      (RQM), It would definitely like automation plan of 'test' type be
      listed
      to choose from. Do we think this should be defined in service
      providers
      name space?. I think having a type in spec will provide client hint
      about
      what type of  Automation plan it is.</pchandor>

      <dnb>I really think this is unnecessary, it is by choosing the
      automation plans from the provider
      where this "hint" of what the automation plan might do. I think that
      the
      type would like end up being close to unique per automation provider
      which
      kind of defeats the purpose. What about automation providers that can
      do
      some generic automation work, would it then be up to the Automation
      Provider to change and require the end user to define the type of
      automation it is from a list of categories. I do not see what the
      gain for
      the consumer is here... If I ask RQM and it returns test, if I ask
      RTC and
      it returns build, and if I ask RAF and it returns deployment (always
      in
      each of these cases) what is the purpose?</dnb>



I'm bringing this discussion up again, because from end user story point of
view, we have an issue not knowing the type of automation.

Consider this user scenario:
As a RTC user, I want to set the test(automation) result inside my build
result so that I can view the test result directly from RTC.

When user configures the cross server communication in RTC, the steps are
usually the following

Step1 -  Set up server friend relationship

Step2 - Set up the project areas associations
      If the friend server is an automation provider that provides several
      types of automation (build, test, provision, deployment...etc.), it
      could be confusing for the user which one is for which.

      Here is an example, RQM is an automation service provider for both
      test and provisioning, this could be in its rootservice.xml

        <jd:oslcCatalogs>
      <oslc:ServiceProviderCatalog rdf:about="
      https://myserver1.ibm.com:9443/qm/auto/test/catalog">
      <oslc:domain rdf:resource="http://open-services.net/ns/auto#"/>
          </oslc:ServiceProviderCatalog>
      <oslc:ServiceProviderCatalog rdf:about="
      https://myserver1.ibm.com:9443/qm/auto/provision/catalog">
       <oslc:domain rdf:resource="http://open-services.net/ns/auto#"/>
      </oslc:ServiceProviderCatalog>
        </jd:oslcCatalogs>

      As you can see, <oslc:domain> for these 2 service providers are the
      same, however, they just have different rdf:about URL, one is for
      test automation, the other is for provision automation.

      But to the end user, when they have to choose the project area
      association, all they see are 2 "Uses - Automation" choices, they
      don't know which one is for which.



The association would show 2
"Uses - Automation" options, with no additional information to show which
one is for test, which one is for provisioning

Step3 - Using a picker to choose an Automation result
When programming this picker, it will need to be in the context of some
integration points, but if we don't know what type is the automation
association, how can we make sure we display the right content?
      e.g.  we need to bring up the UI picker to choose an automation
      (test) result, but it could show a list of the automation result for
      provisioning rather than for test.


Jing J. Qian

Development, Rational Quality Manager
Rational Software
IBM Software Group
4205 S. Miami Blvd.
Durham, NC 27703

Tel: 919-254-9455 T/L: 444-9455
_______________________________________________
Oslc-Automation mailing list
Oslc-Automation at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-automation_open-services.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120703/8c49c64a/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: graycol.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120703/8c49c64a/attachment.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ecblank.gif
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120703/8c49c64a/attachment-0001.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1E225701.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 38328 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120703/8c49c64a/attachment.jpg>


More information about the Oslc-Automation mailing list