[Oslc-Automation] Rough draft of synch/asynch changes
John Arwe
johnarwe at us.ibm.com
Mon Apr 23 17:15:35 EDT 2012
A simplification on [1] and the corresponding discussions (retroactively
;-) ): in the 200 response case, there is actually no need to include the
Request smushed in the Response as part of the 200 payload. The 200
payload can easily be just the Automation Response representation itself
(while there is no harm I can see in smushing in the matching Automation
Request, there is no need to either so it's simpler to just have the
Response).
I have updated
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AutoSpecificationV2Samples with
Examples 2 and 3 to show what each looks like.
[1]
http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/2012-April/000141.html
Best Regards, John
Voice US 845-435-9470 BluePages
Tivoli OSLC Lead - Show me the Scenario
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/oslc-automation_open-services.net/attachments/20120423/e7315013/attachment-0003.html>
More information about the Oslc-Automation
mailing list