[oslc-AssetMgmt] Usage of dcterms:type in latest spec

[Steve K Speicher]

The CM spec is going through the process of deprecating its usage [1] so I 
wouldn't what 2.0 specs have done as a good example.

Your 2nd issue with Jena is an orthogonal issue and shouldn't drive the 
inclusion of this in the spec.

Either way, it doesn't appear from the resolutions on your issues page 
that what you described is where you landed.  You should consider 
reopening this.

[1] - http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmSpecV2Issues , Issue #11

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645


Sheehan Anderson/Durham/IBM wrote on 06/20/2012 01:11:24 PM:

> From: Sheehan Anderson/Durham/IBM
> To: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS, 
> Cc: oslc-assetmgmt at open-services.net
> Date: 06/20/2012 01:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc-AssetMgmt] Usage of dcterms:type in latest spec
> 
> We went back and forth on this many times.  In the end we decided to 
> continue to use dcterms:type.  The two primary reasons for choosing 
> dcterms:type over rdf:type were
> 1.  The other OSLC 2.0 specifications used dcterms:type and we wanted 
our 
> specification to follow a similar format.
> 2.  There were issues with Jena generating abbreviated XML when two 
rdf:type
> properties were present and we did not want to increase complexity for 
> providers implementing the specification.
> 
> Regards,
> Sheehan
> 
> -----oslc-assetmgmt-bounces at open-services.net wrote: -----
> To: oslc-assetmgmt at open-services.net
> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> Sent by: oslc-assetmgmt-bounces at open-services.net
> Date: 06/20/2012 12:56PM
> Subject: [oslc-AssetMgmt] Usage of dcterms:type in latest spec

> In reviewing the latest Asset Mgmt 2.0 spec [1], I was surprised to see 
> dcterms:type still listed.  I see based on Issue #4 and #14 [2] it 
appears 
> that rdf:type should be used as instead of dcterms:type as recommended 
by 
> [3].
> 
> [1] - 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetMgSpecificationV2#Asset
> [2] - 
http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/AssetMgSpecificationV2Issues
> [3] - http://dublincore.org/documents/dc-rdf/
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oslc-AssetMgmt mailing list
> Oslc-AssetMgmt at open-services.net
> 
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/oslc-assetmgmt_open-services.net