[oslc] Reconsidering the "S" in OSLC
SHANI at il.ibm.com
Thu Jan 26 04:47:01 EST 2012
With S == "Specifications", "OSLC Specifications" becomes "Open
Specifications for Lifecycle Collaboration Specifications", which is
I suggest S == "Solutions".
From: Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com>
To: community at open-services.net, oslc-core at open-services.net
Date: 25/01/2012 11:27 PM
Subject: [oslc] Reconsidering the "S" in OSLC
Sent by: community-bounces at open-services.net
As we all know "S" technically stands for "Services" in OSLC but what are
these "Services"? In doing a little digging, the original intent of the
name was to focus on REST and therefore the word "services" was introduced
to represent "REST services". This has led to a number of problems with
confusion over what kind of services are we talking about. For instance,
there is a natural tendency to map the OSLC use of the word service with
that of SOA (Service Oriented Architecture), which is not at all the
association we want. Will this be a constant problem as OSLC expands into
new domains and 3rd party adoption? I believe so.
I'm proposing to fix the problem with "S" standing for "Services" and
instead introduce "Specifications". So try this on for size,
Open Specifications for Lifecycle Collaboration (OSLC)
Open Specifications is really what we want the focus to be out. The
technical approach and the basis on Linked Data quite important as well,
but that is supported by the community's development of open
specifications based on that technology. I believe this is a necessary
change and the right one. It captures what OSLC is really about. Yes,
changing this provides a bit of short term pain but the longer we wait it
will be harder to change and we'll have to continue to deal with the
confusion it introduces.
Of course there are a number of logistics to consider with such a change:
Fixing names used on websites, articles, charts, etc (like the title
of this Community)
Considering updating more complicated things like OSLC intro videos
Considering a better domain name
Do you see this as being an issue worth addressing?
Do you have other suggestions for the letter "S"?
If no big issues, what timeframe would this change occur? I believe the
sooner the better. I'd like to have a gauge on this by January 31st.
I (and the community) would be interested in hearing both support for
this, as well as any concerns. Feel free to reply to this email post
and/or on the forums.
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
Community mailing list
Community at open-services.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Community