[oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors

[Sanjay Joshi]

Continuing this thread of discussion, I would think that as the list 
grows, it will be harder and harder to scroll and search.  Perhaps, a 
filtering mechanism could help based on what spec implementation is of 
interest to the reader, or as Samit suggests - what consumers have been 
validated for, etc ...   Filtering as a feature on the page would be 
useful as this page expands rapidly to match the ecosystem.

I also like the concept of somehow providing a process/capability for an 
implementer to provide a high level description of their solution that 
clearly indicates how OSLC is in play on the page itself or as a sub-page. 
 This would make this page a one-stop shop for quick perusal and 
identification without multiple to/fro navigation outside of the site to 
quickly review the entry.  Even cooler if the site provided a linked data 
story for each of these entries (perhaps an RDF form of the data on the 
pages describing the implementation and this complete list of 
implementations ;-))     Is this intended to be the beginnings of a OSLC 
marketplace?  Would be ideal for OSLC implementers to "want" to have a 
presence on this page over time as a key and popular "marketing" channel 
for their solution. 




Regards
 
Sanjay Joshi
Third (3rd) Party Integrations Lead
Rational Integrations Gearbox Team
Centrelink Lab Advocate
IBM Software, Rational

Phone: 1-919-486-3204 | Mobile: 1-919-819-8866
E-mail: joshisa at us.ibm.com
Find me on:  and within IBM on:  
"While it can be, I will try ... " - ME


4205 S Miami Blvd
Durham, NC 27703-9141
United States 





Samit Mehta/San Francisco/IBM at IBMUS 
Sent by: community-bounces at open-services.net
11/03/2011 06:21 PM

To
Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS, 
cc
community at open-services.net
Subject
Re: [oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors






Building on what Steve comments, I would like to request that we also try 
to capture the 3rd party integrations that have been tested with each 
entry.  For example, a consumer could list what providers have been tested 
with the implementation.  Maybe a column like "Integrations validated / 
supported".

community-bounces at open-services.net wrote on 11/03/2011 04:49:45 PM:

> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: Lee J Reamsnyder/Durham/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: community at open-services.net
> Date: 11/03/2011 04:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors
> Sent by: community-bounces at open-services.net
> 
> > From: Lee J Reamsnyder/Durham/IBM at IBMUS
> > To: community at open-services.net, 
> > Date: 11/03/2011 01:14 PM
> > Subject: [oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors
> > Sent by: community-bounces at open-services.net
> > 
> > I've
> > posted a table of OSLC consumers and providers on the OSLC website
> > (http://open-services.net/software/).
> 
> A few comments on this page:
> 1) It is called "Software", why not "Implementers"?  If it is software, 
> then should probably add a section for things like Eclipse Lyo.
> 2) The column titled "Supported Specifications".  Supported may be too 
> strong a word for some implementations.  Perhaps just "Implemented 
Specs" 
> or just "Specs" (and people will understand).
> 3) Something like a disclaimer and/or more descriptive text to introduce 

> what is being presented.  Like "OSLC implementations have not been 
> validated by any 3rd party", etc
> 4) It would be nice if the product link actually linked to where the 
> software documented/describes its OSLC support.  To help "verify" that 
the 
> entry really does have some OSLC support described.
> 
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/community_open-services.net
> _______________________________________________
Community mailing list
Community at open-services.net
http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/community_open-services.net

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20111104/6c32f6f4/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 518 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20111104/6c32f6f4/attachment.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 467 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20111104/6c32f6f4/attachment-0001.jpe>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20111104/6c32f6f4/attachment.gif>