[oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors

[Samit Mehta]

Building on what Steve comments, I would like to request that we also try
to capture the 3rd party integrations that have been tested with each
entry.  For example, a consumer could list what providers have been tested
with the implementation.  Maybe a column like "Integrations validated /
supported".

community-bounces at open-services.net wrote on 11/03/2011 04:49:45 PM:

> From: Steve K Speicher/Raleigh/IBM at IBMUS
> To: Lee J Reamsnyder/Durham/IBM at IBMUS
> Cc: community at open-services.net
> Date: 11/03/2011 04:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors
> Sent by: community-bounces at open-services.net
>
> > From: Lee J Reamsnyder/Durham/IBM at IBMUS
> > To: community at open-services.net,
> > Date: 11/03/2011 01:14 PM
> > Subject: [oslc] Looking for input on OSLC software and contributors
> > Sent by: community-bounces at open-services.net
> >
> > I've
> > posted a table of OSLC consumers and providers on the OSLC website
> > (http://open-services.net/software/).
>
> A few comments on this page:
> 1) It is called "Software", why not "Implementers"?  If it is software,
> then should probably add a section for things like Eclipse Lyo.
> 2) The column titled "Supported Specifications".  Supported may be too
> strong a word for some implementations.  Perhaps just "Implemented Specs"

> or just "Specs" (and people will understand).
> 3) Something like a disclaimer and/or more descriptive text to introduce
> what is being presented.  Like "OSLC implementations have not been
> validated by any 3rd party", etc
> 4) It would be nice if the product link actually linked to where the
> software documented/describes its OSLC support.  To help "verify" that
the
> entry really does have some OSLC support described.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Community mailing list
> Community at open-services.net
> http://open-services.net/mailman/listinfo/community_open-services.net
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20111103/5ea177a3/attachment-0003.html>