[oslc] Ways to think about OSLC SDK "reference implementations"
Dave
snoopdave at gmail.com
Mon Jun 27 15:07:45 EDT 2011
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Steve K Speicher <sspeiche at us.ibm.com> wrote:
>> From: Dave <snoopdave at gmail.com>
>> Date: 06/27/2011 10:03 AM
>> Subject: [oslc] Ways to think about OSLC SDK "reference implementations"
>>
> SNIP
>
>> Personally, I think we want #1 and #3 above.
>
> Sounds right. Would this imply that #3 would be used to build #1?
I think so.
Although it might happen the other way around, we start with #1 (which
is RIO) an re-factor it so that is is pluggable and becomes #3.
- Dave
More information about the Community
mailing list