[OSLC] OSLC-CM Working Group Minutes 25 November 2009

[Steve K Speicher]

Minutes at: http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings11252009
Attendees: SteveSpeicher, SofiaYeung, AndreWeinand, RobertElves, 
MikKersten, MatsGothe, MarkRinger, SusanDuncan, 
Regrets: ScottBosworth, OlivierBerger, SamLee, DenisTyrell, SamitMehta 
Last minute agenda items 
Review on outstanding Actions see CmMeetingsActions 
Reiterating need for ALL to review scenarios and needs on certain 
properties, see CmCommonProperties 
Mylyn OSLC Java API contribution has been made by Tasktop: RobertElves, 
MikKersten 
Review of CmOfRequirements 
Discussed the difference with scenario of implementing a requirement, 
creation of change request and linking. 
Initial read shows these potential gaps in CM: determining completeness of 
CR and presence of changeset (as a resource and a property of CR) 
WG concensus that this scenario will be included in CM 2.0 scope 
Concern was raised with coordination RmHome (working with topic lead on 
this) 
OAuth discussion 
MikKersten, RobertElves have not encountered OAuth in the many connectors 
they support, prominant one is HTTP-basic 
ACTION: RobertElves to produce survey of what type of auth model they've 
encountered (kind and frequency). 
Noted that their may be classes of integrations to may require OAuth 
(3-legged), while other scenarios (2-legged) can rely on HTTP-Basic 
Review of 1.0 spec comments 
WG agreed with responses proposed 
Similar comments apply to response to Ian's comments 
Review of CmCommonProperties mapping effort 
GoogleDocs? spreadsheet updated with "Frequency" column (B) and color 
coded to highlight commonality. Many WG members found this format to be 
very useful 
Discussion around need to carefully define Project and Component: 
suggestions were around defining them in generic terms as "context" 
(Project) and "subtext" (Component) for hierarchal systems, though there 
may be a need for tagged-based model (Google code). Will queue up for a 
future WG topic. 
ACTION: All WG participants to validate entries 
Next Steps: 
WG participants to validate entries and scenarios involved 
SteveSpeicher to propose an CR 2.0 definition based on frequency of use + 
scenario needs 
Next meetings: 
9-Dec 12:00 PM Eastern 
16-Dec 12:00 PM Eastern (added) 

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20091125/38dc92c9/attachment-0003.html>