[Community] OSLC Change Management Working Group Minutes from 10 June 2009

[Steve K Speicher]

http://open-services.net/bin/view/Main/CmMeetings06102009

Minutes: 
Attendees: SteveSpeicher, AndreWeinand, SamitMehta, RobertElves, 
MikKersten, JayGillibrand? , SteveAbrams, RandyVogel 
Feedback and impressions from Rational Software Conference 
SteveAbrams OSLC was very well received across the board 
MikKersten also noticed the level of interested in OSLC 
RandyVogel many good discussions as well, including business partners 
SteveSpeicher witnessed interest at all levels: customers, integrators 
(other Rational product teams) 
AndreWeinand heard about OSLC from many people, were happy to see spec 
completed and products supporting 
Retrospective on 1.0 efforts: 
MikKersten 
Works well: implementations is key in making it all work 
Needs improvement: need for reference implementation for service 
providers, something easier to work with without requiring timely legal 
approvals, be good to have a task tracker and forum threads 
General discussion on involvement with additional implementors and spec 
involvement: all to take action to pursue this 
RandyVogel 
Works well: meetings and wikis all went well, as well as level our design 
feedback, sometimes it went in fair amount detail 
SamitMehta 
Needs improvement: startup for implementations access is needed, possibly 
looking at expanding scenarios to get more people involved 
ScottBosworth 
Works well: implementations working in progress with spec worked well and 
could 
Needs improvement: dealing with maturing as a site, across OSLC: shared 
components; share more info via group email 
AndreWeinand 
Works well: echoing previous comments where implementations are key 
Needs improvement: areas may be harder to adopt when specifications 
priorities and scenarios diverge from some product requirements. 
RobertElves 
Needs improvement: need for a test site (reference implementation) to get 
access to; better consideration of programatic consumption of the spec; 
would prefer a non-Web (non-JavaScript) version of the dialogs for 
consumption in tools like Eclipse 
SteveAbrams 
Works well: echoing previous comments where implementations are key; scope 
was key 
Needs improvement: could have spent more time to make it simpler; make 
sure products continue; common concepts challenges 
SteveSpeicher 
Works well: agreement on spec and impl in parallel 
Needs improvement: make sure discussions and work is all on wiki and 
public 
Next meeting 24 June 2009 12:00 ET 

Thanks,
Steve Speicher | IBM Rational Software | (919) 254-0645
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://open-services.net/pipermail/community_open-services.net/attachments/20090610/53616162/attachment-0003.html>